Happy Flare-tuesday

Inspired by JJ Abram’s ridiculous liberal use of lens flare in Star Trek, I’ve been messing with flares on my own time.  Using a basic dSLR and with various lenses at different aperture settings…

Canon EF 100mm F2 @ F22

Bright and sunny

EF 50mm F1.4
Flare from 50mm F1.4

Flare from 50mm F1.4

Flare from 50mm F1.4

You’ll notice the shape of the flare is very different for different lenses, and also the aperture size(F-stop setting) plays a big part in defining the shape of the flare as well.  In general, large f-number(F22) gives a more defined star-burst shape to the flare, while a small f-number (F1.4) gives a softer looking flare.

Anamorphic lens flares, which looks ‘cooler’ in my opinion, are harder to reproduce on a regular consumer camera because they require special anamorphic lenses.

    • RH2
    • November 24th, 2009

    Do you think there’s a way to improve blenders lenses flares?

    • mike pan
    • November 24th, 2009

    I think people are working on improving it for the Sintel project. We’ll probably see some really cool looking flares soon!

    • 3pointedit
    • December 1st, 2009

    Ha, I wonder how many of those google image ana flares are real?! Thats the hard thing today, getting acurate reference, in this cause I thank you, any chance of adding the aperture to those extra photos of yours?

    Have you seen the thread at Blenderartists, where someone actualy made a 3D flare object? would be a cool lighting layer object to layer to rig into a scene.

    • mike pan
    • December 2nd, 2009

    I guess some of them must be added in post-processing. Filming flare is kinda dangerous, too much light can easily ruin the shot, and it’s hard to recover the image when it’s just a wash of white. Adding them in post is much ’safer’. But some might claim it’s less authentic.

  1. No trackbacks yet.